Any company can take something and maintain it, and Microsoft has the money. But the motive never appears to be much more than a business to make money with. Perhaps I am still a bit bitter about Skype.
Any company can take something and maintain it, and Microsoft has the money. But the motive never appears to be much more than a business to make money with. Perhaps I am still a bit bitter about Skype.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/12/nsa_offers_billions...
Microsoft put Skype into the PRISM program one month after announcing it was acquiring it:
May 2011: https://www.wired.com/2011/05/microsoft-buys-skype-2/
June 2011(second image): https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jun/06/us-tech-giants...
In 2012: they replaced Skype's P2P architecture to make it easier to spy on (obviously they wouldn't say that, just like Facebook never says it's building shadow profiles for advertising reasons: https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/05/skype...
More: https://www.theverge.com/2013/7/11/4514938/nsa-could-pull-em...