Hacker News Reader

Comment by Michael_Groom | Hacker News Reader

I do, we are talking about a non-linear spinor dynamic here, omitting the gamma algebra inherited by Dirac spinors. This algebra is well known and omitted as it would render the text confusing indeed as spinor products are of relatively high order (psi-27 and psi-19).

View on HN

Are there any references to other scientific papers in that document? I didn't see any.

No references. The fundamental idea is based on the Equation of Matter suggested in 1958 by Werner Heisenberg. Anything else is new. This theory solves the problems, Heisenberg introduced with his equation by eleminating the coupling constant l (dim psi = -1/2 hence not observable instead of -3/2) and adding the point split on the right side of the equation which is a consequence of the differential operator on the left side (dx is equivalent to the point split). The rest naturally follows from this fundamental equation.

From skimming the pdf, I didn't notice any conventional equations such as one would find in a paper by someone like Heisenberg. If there were any, could you point one out?

Edit/post script: I also don't see that the word "algebra" is mentioned in the document at all. By comparison the Wikipedia page on spinors uses the word "algebra" 116 times. That seems odd if this theory is based on a deep understanding of spinors.

Side-Remark, page 17:

http://norbert-winter.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2014-05...

This is not the same document as originally linked, and regardless, it doesn't cite a source. What's with that?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com