Project Drawdown ranks every approach in terms of tonnage of CO2 and cost. http://www.drawdown.org/solutions-summary-by-rank
These approaches get amplified by a price on carbon. If you are interested in convincing your Member of Congress to price carbon, take a look at the most effective organization doing this work: http://www.citizensclimatelobby.org
I was surprised to find that, of all things, "Refrigerant Management" is the single thing that holds the greatest potential to reduce carbon emissions [1]. It makes a lot of sense, but it would definitely not be what I would have guessed.
[1] http://www.drawdown.org/solutions/materials/refrigerant-mana...
They are probably the two easiest ways regular folks can learn about and get involved in climate policy (and I mean real impacts, not just clicktivism).
Please get involved – it takes no money and very little time!
Why would they have to bring feminism into that? I mean sure, it's a good thing to educate everyone. But why mix it?
How can I trust all the other points on the list now? What if they are also just pushing some other political agenda?
I can't. They just compromised the list's integrity by that.
Why not also establish a one-child policy in western countries? Or start actively killing sick people? /s
All the other reasons were basically how it makes lifes better for those women. Which is surely a good thing, but doesn't matter in that context.