The people I talk to, from Microsoft. Disagree. The politics are brutal and the infrastructure brittle and constantly changing (with all the overhead and oversight of a high-security industry like finance) until nothing really gets done.
Even concrete stuff like "offices going away" completely depends on your team.
There is an extremely thin line of commonality that you can pretty easily discern by reading blog posts and watching videos of the CEO and folks like Scott Guthrie; I find what I see in those communications to be genuine.
(disclosure: At Microsoft, and liking the culture)
Sure, company politics can interfere with this on occasion but it's rare. I read the question more as, "Which companies have the best philosophies regarding how engineering should be done?"
Could be a difference of course, but it's not clear.