The only reason the United States hasn't seen a shrinking population (and stagnating economy) like much of Europe and Japan is due to immigration:
https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/11/10/16631980/fertili...
Now you might say "so they don't have your culture, big deal". No, that's not what I mean.
I mean middle eastern sections in big european cities have unemployment rates that are only a little better than middle eastern cities, and that simply won't work. Effectively, with the numbers as they are, immigrants are largely a negative influence, purely economically speaking: they're a drag rather than a gain.
Needless to say, given the political climate shift currently going through Europe, nobody likes reporting this, as it seems rather unlikely to improve anything.
But if we're going down that road, Second - America has been absorbing and integrating millions of people throughout its history and has only been the wealthier for it.
America was literally built by people showing up and carving out a life for themselves. There is something about the culture that offers more room for that to happen once you arrive.
Population deceleration is a global crisis and virtually nobody is talking about it. It could mean the end of Western civilization.
Our governments are built upon the assumption that the population will continue to increase, that there will be more taxpayers tomorrow to shoulder the burden of today’s spending. When the population begins to decrease in a few decades, every successive generation will have a lower standard of living than the one that proceded it. Having children will become more expensive which will lead to even more decline. Western countries will enter a death spiral and might never escape.
Human population grows exponentially, earth has finite resources. Constant population growth is suicidal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_stagnation_theory
A component of which is the observation that real production growth has been essentially zero since the 1980s. So clearly you can have technological advances without any productivity growth.
> Human population grows exponentially, earth has finite resources. Constant population growth is suicidal.
Not nearly as suicidal as population decline, obviously.
More nuanced, there are plenty of species, and races within species, that refuse to have their population grow. It doesn't end well.
A little perspective is required. From the 1860’s to the 1960’s we went from candles and horses to computers and the moon landing. In the past 50 years nothing comparable to electricity, automobiles, flight, space flight, antibiotics, refrigeration, computers, telephones, radio, nuclear power, etc. has been invented. We have only refined technology invented by our great grandparents. Our civilization is stagnant and incapable of producing the kind of people who can move us forward. And, when the population begins to decline, we’ll begin to regress. Our great grandchildren might only read about airplanes in books.
Earth (global) problem is overpopulation. Depopulation is only a problem for western civilization/highly developed countries. Ask India, China or African countries do they need more citizens.
Unfortunately, current models show their growth ending before they are wealthy.
In other words - there's a good chance these countries will get old before they get rich.
China is #1 example of this:
http://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/china-birth-l...