Imagine if Intel were two companies, Intel Design and Intel Manufacturing. This wouldn't have arisen - Intel Design would have produced the new ICL design and could have worked with Intel Manufacturing and TSMC on how to build it, ultimately using TSMC if IM couldn't make it.
Microsoft got past that problem, and I’m sure Intel will too. Like 1990-2010 intel, the foundry companies have been able to hide a lot of their warts through growth. IMO, the smartphone revolution will peak much more quickly than PCs, and Intel competitors will gave their own life threatening challenges.
Why not both? Their current business model is threatened by a technical challenge, but the company's exposure to that threat could've been mitigated by making small changes to the business model — by unbundling and diversifying.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/Print/2012/05/03/unsung_heroes...
When the first test chips came back from the lab on the 26 April 1985, Furber plugged one into a development board, and was happy to see it working perfectly first time.
Deeply puzzling, though, was the reading on the multimeter connected in series with the power supply. The needle was at zero: the processor seemed to be consuming no power whatsoever.
As Wilson tells it: “The development board plugged the chip into had a fault: there was no current being sent down the power supply lines at all. The processor was actually running on leakage from the logic circuits. So the low-power big thing that the ARM is most valued for today, the reason that it's on all your mobile phones, was a complete accident."
Wilson had, it turned out, designed a powerful 32-bit processor that consumed no more than a tenth of a Watt.
[1] https://www.qualcomm.com/products/sdm845
[2] https://www.qualcomm.com/sites/ember/files/styles/optimize/p...