It’s an example of how google is getting more anti user. They obviously have data on this feature usage. They make a bit of a pain and don’t make it a user preference. I fear this means it’s one of the myriad of little features that developers put in that are eventually de supported.
I imagine the following scenario in a design meeting:
PM: SO THE NEW FEATURE IS AMAZING, WE WILL SHOW USERS THE MOST LIKELY RESULTS THAT THEY WANT TO SEE. AND THIS LEADS TO MORE AD CLICKS.
DEV: BUT WHAT ABOUT WHEN IT DOESNT EVEN HAVE WORDS FROM THE SEARCH?
PM: THATS NOT AN ISSUE, OUR ALGORITHM SHOWS THAT 80% OF OUR USERS CLICK ON THESE RESULTS
DEV: HOW WILL I SEARCH STACKOVERFLOW? HOW ABOUT I ADD AN OPTION TO JUST USE THE EXACT TEXT?
PM: WE HAVE TO FOCUS ON SCOPE, CANT WASTE TIME ON BONUS FEATURES
DEV: ITS NOT A BONUS FEATURE ITS HOW SEARCH WORKS BEFORE YOUR CHANGE. IT TAKES 30 SECONDS.
PM: WELL EXACT SEARCH MAKES US LESS AD REVENUE
DEV: ITS REALLY USEFUL
PM: OK MAKE IT HARD TO GET TO SO USERS DONT GET CONFUSED
DEV: OK, AND ILL MAKE A SETTING SO ITS NOT THAT BIG OF A DEAL
PM: NO SETTING THAT WOULD BE A COMMITMENT TO KEEP THE FEATURE
<dec shudders thinking of how she will be hated my millions of users who are inconvenienced, wonders where her life has gone, dreams of a better world, starts typing...curtain>
This is in the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.