Hacker News Reader

Comment by cptskippy | Hacker News Reader

And yet without them we probably wouldn't have EVs today.

That seems unlikely, considering that the first "Golden Age" for EVs was in the late 1890s and early 1900s.[1] Musk was the first to use lithium-ion batteries for a highway-legal vehicle, but is that really a unique innovation that wouldn't have occurred to anyone else?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_electric_vehicl...

The 'innovation' is that car companies did not (and still do not) want to make EV cars. There's so much inertia behind ICE vehicles the incentive to make EVs is small.

1) Oil companies don't want them. 2) Dealerships don't want them. 3) Automakers don't want them.

Tesla's energy has forced the issue.

> The 'innovation' is that car companies did not (and still do not) want to make EV cars

Car companies want to sell cars that can make a profit. They're willing to wait for the technology to improve to the point that that is feasible.

Unfortunately our planet isn't.

Ah, so we’ve crossed from the “it’s impossible” to the “it was inevitable” stage of disruption :p

Just like how, without Apple, we wouldn't have had rounded corners.

Pretty much the only reason any car manufacturer has ANY EV program is because of the threat of Tesla.

Bob Lutz said w/o Tesla my Volt (or now Bolt) would not exist.

The regulatory pressure federally and by California to decrease emissions plus incentives to buy EVs matter too.

The car companies just made compliance cars (and created astroturf org) to battle that. Until Tesla shamed them, they never really had to make serious effort.

Shaming is very different than presenting an actual threat which some people claim Tesla was or is.

When I say "shame" I mean the consensus from the auto industry was/is:

1) EVs are slow 2) EVs can go far on a single charge 3) EVs are ugly 4) Batteries degrade a lot over time 5) EVs are expensive.

etc, etc, etc

Tesla has knocked out most of those bullet points.

> The regulatory pressure federally and by California to decrease emissions

That pressure is dictated by the administration in power and the current administration has already started the process of rolling back the prior administration's regulations by changing CAFE requirements. In addition to that they've also questioned that Waiver that gives CARB it's authority. If successful they would strip CA of it's regulatory power.

> plus incentives to buy EVs matter too.

And those expire. Once Nissan hit's 300k units of the Leaf sold in the US they'll lose their credit and there will be very little motivation for people to purchase it. Unless they're able to significantly reduce the MSRP or dramatically increase the batteryt capacity, I wouldn't be surprised if the ceased production shortly after hitting 300k units.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com