They built the ability the launch k8s clusters through the docker tool. There are almost no tweets or posts about Swarm instead, their blog is full of kubernetes posts (https://blog.docker.com/). Even their coolhacks section is about "kubeflow". Top rated session at Dockercon was kubernetes.
i really hope they open up more and talk about their future plans and engage with the community.
this is what is scaring us. We love Swarm and really respect all the dev efforts... but the corporate K8s bias in unmistakable. These are some of the kubernetes posts over the last 2 days from Docker's twitter account: https://twitter.com/Docker/status/1016340701800431618
https://twitter.com/Docker/status/1015620961712967681
https://twitter.com/Docker/status/1015535938678738950
https://twitter.com/Docker/status/1015475755428597760
Number of Swarm posts in the same time ? Zero. In fact, I would be hard pressed to find a public tweet about Swarm in a long time.
This was the first Docker event in Lahore - https://events.docker.com/events/details/docker-lahore-prese...
Its Kubernetes everywhere.
[1] https://www.bretfisher.com/is-swarm-dead-answered-by-a-docke... from https://forums.docker.com/t/is-there-a-roadmap-for-docker-sw...
Even today a big PR was pulled in to improve the scalability of Swarm https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/37372
More updates here https://github.com/docker/swarmkit/issues/2665#issuecomment-...
I think the Kubernetes and Swarm devs have generally leveraged IPVS as the next step from iptables. Any thoughts on going straight to BPF ?