Stifling the first amendment is serious business. When are judges going to be held accountable for their wrong actions?
The fact that you don't like the conclusion doesn't mean the judge acted wrongly. There's nothing to be held accountable for.
The reasoning or decision itself, on the other hand, will go through the processes of review that almost all judicial decisions go through.
https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/impeachments-federal-judg...
That doesn't include how many resigned facing likely impeachment.
This sort of thing often slows down promotions into higher courts (as it should — lower courts should not routinely waste everyone’s time and money with rulings that will surely be overturned on appeal).