Well, one interesting thing about the article is the way it describes GOFAI as based on false ideas, which is harsh but fair. But in a lot of ways, GOFAI was "applied philosophy", at least something of a direct map of one form of rationalist philosophy to computation.

GOFAI was abandoned but the various perspectives remain and current AI goes forward without necessarily having any larger perspective at all, just "make it work". One might guess we're waiting for a different coherent philosophy to organize the process.