Engineering a Hook That Could Make Drone Deliveries Real
wired.com
wired.com
André is also responsible for building a pretty awesome jet turbine powered chainsaw. :-D
Its an egg-shaped attachment; so there is natural force to push off a matching egg shaped hook (but the overall hook is too large to pass through the hole again)
Clear to see in these youtube videos; the CAD shot of the interface in the body of the craft gives you a clear idea of the shape so it only fits one way.
https://youtu.be/BYMLZ2_6d4o?t=1m59s https://youtu.be/XqLkMdwEWRc?t=1m25s
While hoping that electric cars will make cities less noisy (I can feel it in Berlin with more and more electric cars and scooters), the buzzing sounds of drones is already too loud for me - and I've seen only several so far.
That's going to be terrible, having dozens of them buzzing around, like your typical high-pitched scooter, but next to your 3rd floor window.
Any quiet drones in development? ;)
[0] https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/1/16573820/dji-mavic-pro-pl...
[1] https://x.company/projects/wing/ (scroll about half way down and there should be a slideshow you can click into)
> Just a few feet above the ground, the drone drops the box then zips back up into the sky and disappears. The spectacle is over in 20 seconds.
https://www.economist.com/business/2018/06/09/how-e-commerce...
https://www.economist.com/business/2018/06/09/how-e-commerce...
Rwanda too, with Zipline.
They do not simply deploy a wound bobbin, but instead have the bobbin after 2 idler wheels. One wheel is housed on a lever - The weight of the claw (or in this case package) keeps the idler on a lever pushed down during most of the operation - when it contacts a prize (or in this case the floor) the idler receives less load and thus the lever moves up ensuring it does not jam or unwind further.
Its a pretty ingenious design from an age where load sensing would be very expensive - and achieves robust bi-directional winding with end detection with just 1 microswitch.
This zero-moving parts hook sounds great, but I don't see how much different it can be from a gravity hook, or a ships buoy-hook; unless it simply captures the package interface in a specific orientation (anyone who has ever played "fishing" with 2L pop bottles and a curtain ring knows the satisfaction of such mechanisms) - my guess would be that the attachment point is a specific shape rather than a circle; to promote the tension-less force to movement up and off.
Just the sole fact that they have no payload faring tells me that they don't have a single man with aeronautic engineering background.
Not sure how recent this photo is, but it gives a feel for what the box looks/looked like at some stage:
https://www.simplebotics.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/alph...
https://9to5google.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/project-wing-...
Well, this does look more or less reassuring. Still, even an aeronatics amateur will judge whatever they have there as an abomination.
I just checked. That man is... an industrial designer, not an aeronautic engineer.
Wing as a project, though, has designed their own aircraft, so I'm going to say, yes, they have aerospace people on staff.
It should be possible to fit a package fairing when possible and get more efficiency.
But surely it’s preferable to design for odd-shaped and cuboid packages, and take the efficiency hit? The result is a far more useful machine.
Makes sense to me to shape the box, then you don't have to drag the fairing through the return leg.