Moral imperative of forced medicine meeting the moral imperative to protect the weak.
Who has more rights ?
Who has more rights ?
Strong or weak I don't think it is in anyone's interest to have a large percentage of the population die due to rampant disease.
So I will go with "forced" medicine, and fluorine in my tap water.
Unfortunately comments like this convey misinformation and could help to spread anti-vax positions.
There's very little research to suggest that ingestion of fluoride has any positive health impact. Comparing the two issues is quite misleading.
Because in america we believe in an individual's personal right and a limited government. A government free to take your children away when there is no immediate danger would certainly violate this.
If people understood herd immunity, understood that the underpinnings of the anti-vax movement are based on debunked fraudulent science, etc, this "anti-vax" situation would've never come into being.