the law of diminishing returns is in full effect here, regardless of what the engineers and SC want to tell themselves.
the law of diminishing returns is in full effect here, regardless of what the engineers and SC want to tell themselves.
This is a good argument for treating all vehicles equally and reducing congestion with a tax, not by arbitrarily targeting Ubers but not single occupancy private cars. If you only target Ubers then a lot of that reduction will just be made up with more private cars being driven around to take up the slack in the congestion.
The only toll route I know of anywhere near London is the QE2 crossing, which is outside Greater London.
The CCZ (congestion charging zone) covers less than 5% of the Greater London area. There are plans to expand the CCZ, and tackle pollution via an ultra-low-emission-zone.
> "The Congestion Charge is an £11.50 daily charge for driving a vehicle within the charging zone between 07:00 and 18:00, Monday to Friday."
The "Greater London" is an abusive name to designate the whole region around London, with little relation to the actual city. It should not be used for any comparison.
For comparison, London and Paris are about the same size. Paris is 105 km2 while (The Greater) London is 1500 km2.
We have a mayor who's very anti-public transit so it will not happen anytime soon.