If Intel treated the original USB in the same way they do ThunderBolt, we'd still be using ADB, serial, parallel, and PS/2 interfaces on all our machines.
If Intel treated the original USB in the same way they do ThunderBolt, we'd still be using ADB, serial, parallel, and PS/2 interfaces on all our machines.
The "problem" with Thunderbolt is the same as with Firewire, it's overkill for most of the consumer market. I don't think that's a deal breaker, people who are willing and able to pay for computers with Thunderbolt and devices have plenty of options.
The Macbook has one port that looks the same but it isn't a Thunderbolt 3 port and only supports speeds up to 5Gbps.
Hey, I'm willing to pay for Thunderbolt on an AMD Threadripper (because PCIe lanes matter) and I'm happy to build devices based on it (as noted, that was what I working on for a couple of years). Feel free to show me the options available to achieve that goal absent being a special preferred Intel vendor.
Amusingly, I have some history with Intel... I worked there. I've also seen how they mismanage or abandon anything that isn't core x86.