Headlines omit qualifiers. If you read the headline as "Fewer women than men want to run startups because many of them would rather have children", I think it's entirely accurate. Sure, there are women who don't want children, just like there are men who want nothing more than to be stay-at-home dads -- but they're the exception, not the rule.
It wasn't just the headline. Example: "even the most child-oriented men are not as child-oriented as their wives." This line isn't merely lacking in qualifiers, it explicitly denies exceptions, saying that even outliers fit the stereotype.
(I happen to be one of the exceptions.)
It should have been headlined "Opinion: ...", as it's not like the article is full of research, etc.
This whole argument goes back to the beginning of the feminist movement and people not being willing to hire women because they should be making some man sandwiches and popping out babies.
The trend is leaning towards more women having fewer children, if they are having them at all (http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8...).
(This is nothing to do with you being a woman - that just increases the factor by an order of magnitude or two.)
Even the people you know are probably outliers. So you have to be a bit careful relying on your experience and instead look at broader demographic trends.
Nearly all of the people I know well have no TV. Should I assume that TV is hugely unpopular with everyone?