Millennials are sharing streaming passwords, and companies losing millions
cnbc.com
cnbc.com
This is why I started paying for Spotify years before I paid for Netflix. It is simply easier to find music there and let it sync between my phone and computer via their service than find every single song, download it, and sync it by hand. Also, there is no way in hell I'm paying $1 per song for thousands of songs. That method is vastly more expensive with none of the conveniences (and usually some sort of lock-in, even if weak).
So in my opinion, companies need to figure out how to make their services more convenient than the alternative. Spotify figured it out, Steam Games figured it out. Netflix figured it out when it was in competition with Blockbuster and Redbox but has since lost it. The fact of the matter is, all the content is scattered across all the services, and the combined cost is not worth it. If we had different services serving all the content (similar to pandora/last.fm/spotify/youtube red) then people could pay for the service, not the content. And ultimately, the first service we are willing to pay for is convenience.
It'd be pretty lame if you had to check if your friend wanted to watch something before using Netflix and that'd probably drive anyone who was actually a lost sale (rather than someone who will never pay in any case) to purchase their own account.
I realise there are family deals etc. but that's a risk the companies take in creating those deals (that they will make more money than they will lose).
Sharing a password is (and should not be labelled as) a crime, because it is similar to sharing a bus ticket: if I can let my friends use it, why shouldn't I do it?