"Solve it with block-chains!"
"You've not heard my problem yet."
"Doesn't matter!"
"Solve it with block-chains!"
"You've not heard my problem yet."
"Doesn't matter!"
Blockchain-overuse snark is not the solution to every blockchain proposal.... especially if you haven't heard the proposal yet.
A decentralized solution removes the question who maintains a centralized database. That's important because, as you say, the answer to that question has always been the state. Which means it's never really been a question.
If you're cool with the government owning your identity -- and truly having the power to erase your entire existence, so they're not denying you any rights because there is no "you" -- then it doesn't matter. But for some people, it might matter to be able to point to something other than the mirror and say "I exist, and not just because I say I do. This matters because [this entity] is taking actions that are inconsistent with my existence and implied rights."
It's a small step, but it's one that opens up options that don't exist today.
It doesn't matter because the provider of identity is the same entity that needs to accept the identity: the Myanmar government and they don't want to accept them. This "solution" is ridiculous.