>The Clause was drafted as a reactionary move to solve against specific bad behavior. I'm not entirely sure it's my place to call out these actors

Still frustratingly vauge. Without this information I can't assume The Commons Clause is working in good faith. At least you can speak to the types of behaviors, rather than the specific actors, which led to this?

>See the commons clause FAQ for answers to your other questions

I specifically refered to your website in my comment and called out the summary there as insufficient. Can you elaborate on it here on HN?