Anyone care to explain the downvotes? The poster I replied to claimed that Dalvik is different because people target different languages at it. Not only do people do this for the JVM, I think it was probably the first VM where people did this.
1) impolite. 2) your comments should concentrate on what you can add to the convo, not what others haven't.
I mean, it also doesn't help that your statement was incorrect (P-system as mentioned), but being rude in what is ideally a civil forum dedicated to a stated purpose is not helpful.
Reading comprehension, bro. Give it a try.
The Dalvik VM, like the Java Virtual Machine, is quite capable of running languages that aren't Java. There's nothing controversial or incorrect about that statement.