For instance, take
http://i17.tinypic.com/4uneoft.jpg
Remove the title, add a mistake or two in the score, and give it to some jazz fan who can read music, he'll recognize the tune instantly, yet nobody ever played it this way, so blandly.
For instance, take
http://i17.tinypic.com/4uneoft.jpg
Remove the title, add a mistake or two in the score, and give it to some jazz fan who can read music, he'll recognize the tune instantly, yet nobody ever played it this way, so blandly.
You'll almost never hear any seasoned jazz players refer to a chart like this as a "score", unless they have a very very classical background, or are sort of making a joke about the quality of a particular lead sheet. Scores are for orchestras and films and things like that. It's strange to see people keep referring to these sh*tty transcriptions as 'scores'.
It's like calling Kraft Mac 'n' cheese "pasta". Like, ok maybe technically it could qualify as a pasta, but you don't really refer to it as that in practice.