It's hard to find an appropriate segmentation for an air gap without sacrificing features, and most customers won't trade features for "security".
It's hard to find an appropriate segmentation for an air gap without sacrificing features, and most customers won't trade features for "security".
Then again, this exact scenario actually happened and having an intermediary didn't help. https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/blackhat-jeep-cherokee-hack-e...
I understand that it a little wasteful to not use that big touch screen in the center console to do configuration of the driving experience, but there's no safe way to do so.
No idea how it was one or two decades ago, but modern architectures certainly have one.
I can't remember the specifics, but the one I looked at was actually pretty beefy hardware-wise, it had three reasonably powerful cores, 1GB RAM, etc.
> There is no reason for everything to be on the same bus.
It isn't. They would run into bandwidth or (more likely) latency issues anyway.