Can you please add links for your pp. 1-4?
Otherwise it looks like you assume the result of this path without helping us actually walk it.
Otherwise it looks like you assume the result of this path without helping us actually walk it.
Somewhere in the middle he linked to the paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.04184.pdf
From there you can get to its abstract page that also carries the versions: https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04184
So I went through more than half of abstract versions and the article itself, struggle to find anything scandalous there. I persuade everyone to do the same.