> The GM CFO retired after 40 years with the company. The GM CAO left for another job and gave 90 days notice. It’s a little different.
The original claim was that the number of departures was high. Comparing the number of departures, there does not appear to be a large disparity.
You raise the question of the context. The first Tesla CAO left citing personal reasons. The conspiracy theory is that this is a dog whistle for some kind of accounting irregularities, but as far as I know neither he nor anyone else with actual knowledge has even suggested that as a motive. What actual evidence is there that he didn't honestly leave for personal reasons?
The second CAO actually described his reasons:
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/07/tesla-cao-dave-morton-quit-a...
The whole "funding secured" drama literally happened on his second day and he didn't like it.
Nothing about that episode is super inspiring and his reaction is entirely understandable, but how is this supposed to spell doom for the company?
Meanwhile the other departures seem to be for the normal reasons with people in a low unemployment job market finding another job somewhere else and that sort of thing.
But given the drama, now people are looking under every rock for something to gossip about.