A Defence of Common Sense (1925)

I like how no-one commented on this. Its a formidable bit of writing. You'd need to make sure you really got it before risking a critique or an analysis of it. A risky thing to comment on.

I find the language interesting, he's having to use very specific phrases and structures again and again to try and carve out what he's saying and what he isn't saying. Makes me wonder what a philosophical declarative language might look like, or even a philosophical programming language (what would that even mean?? I like the idea though).