eg. it's ok to discuss violence in Black communities and cheating in Asia, but it would be racist to assert that because you are Black/Asian/White you are more predisposed to violence/cheating/racism
eg. it's ok to discuss violence in Black communities and cheating in Asia, but it would be racist to assert that because you are Black/Asian/White you are more predisposed to violence/cheating/racism
Nobody asserted that. So why is racism being discussed?
The fact that a conclusion is racist does not mean it is factually incorrect.
This isn't about what is "OK", this is about what is true.
> it's ok to discuss violence in Black communities and cheating in Asia, but it would be racist to assert that because you are Black/Asian/White you are more predisposed to violence/cheating/racism
Your implication is that something cannot be true if it is racist. This is a non sequitor. Race should never have been brought up in the first place.