Hacker News Reader

This is only going to lead to "We don't have a female, let's just find one and put her there because the law says so."

First and hopefully last state, but I'm not optimistic...

No it's not, because board members are important. The conversation, at worst, will be "how can we find the best qualified woman we can to fill the board seat required." They can expand the board to meet this requirement so they won't be unable to hire anyone.

How does the law prevent the founders from putting some of their wives to the board?

It doesn't. Looking the other members of the board in the eye and telling them you couldn't find anyone in the world more qualified for one of the most important jobs at YOUR company - responsible for hiring and firing the CEO - than your girlfriend or wife based on no other parameters should stop you from doing that. I'd imagine you'd have a difficult time raising money too - let alone the publicity.

The law doesn't stop me from running each board meeting in the form of interpretive dance, either. As a board member, I would likely seek to fire that founder immediately in either case.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com