In the end, we agree that we don't agree. And for the sake of the discussion it is better than we stop now and don't go towards the 2nd.
In the end, we agree that we don't agree. And for the sake of the discussion it is better than we stop now and don't go towards the 2nd.
My comment was in reply to a comment that equated a parliament electing a chancellor / prime minister with an electoral college. Despite all the downsides of not electing the head of government directly they still are different things.
parliament == electoral_college + congress
Specifically for Germany and the USA:
Bundestag == electoral_college + house_of_representatives
Bundesrat == senate
So you effectively do have a congress and an electoral college. In your system, they are merged and thus have the same members.
There are six typical roles:
1. lower legislative body
2. upper legislative body
3. electoral college
4. supreme court
5. head of state
6. executive
You have the 1==3 and 5==6 mergers. The USA has only the 5==6 merger. The UK has the 1==3 merger and prior to 2009 had the 2==4 merger.
All the Bundesrat has in common with thr Senate is being a second chamber. It is not elected directly as a body. Instead the prime ministers of ech state are making it up. So it is voted for indirectly during state elections. Votes in the Bundesrat are than based population, more or less (if someone knows the details that'll be cool). coalition governments different to the one on the federal level usually abstain (e.g. parties A and B govern federal, C and D being the opposition while parties B and D govern a certain state that state will note vote on certain issues).
In a democracy, these details do actually matter a lot. Otherwise you won't be able to ditinguish democracies on paper from real ones.