Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

coldtea

>Open Source is a term coined by the OSI.

No, it's not:

http://www.catb.org/~esr/open-source.html

And even if it was, popular terms reach beyond the persons/organizations that coined them.

Unless it's trademarked, it's just a term all kinds of people use, many of which don't know/care about OSI.

In fact:

https://opensource.org/pressreleases/certified-open-source.p...

View on HN

Okay, pedantry... If you want to be specific: https://opensource.com/article/18/2/coining-term-open-source...

But it was done coincidentally with the discussions that ultimately led to the OSI and the OSD.

>> Bruce Perens has applied to register "open source" as a trademark and hold it through Software in the Public Interest. The trademark conditions will be known as the ``Open Source Definition'', essentially the same as the Debian Free Software Guidelines.

Your own reference contains this text, btw.

Bruce attempted to register a certification mark (a type of trademark), but the application lapsed in 1999 after OSI discovered that there was virtually zero chance of registering the term "open source" as a mark, as the term is too descriptive.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com