This starts to get very shaky as soon as it gets to the "Happiness" heading.

> Happiness is the psychological condition that results from the achievement of one’s [values](sic).

I'd say that's meaning. Puppy videos give you happiness. They don't give you meaning.

> Values are ends that a person acts to gain and/or keep. They are those things that a person cares about having or doing.

That... what? My values are not my ends or my activities.

These two definitions end with a footnote:

> Both characterizations are from Ayn Rand, “The Objectivist Ethics,” The Virtue of Selfishness (New York: Signet, 1964) 31, 16.

Without taking a stance on Rand, is that really the foremost place to find a definition of happiness and value? This strikes me as intellectually dishonest to the point of silliness.