For non-technical people, I think there's not much difference between using a computer with Ubuntu, Mac or Windows, for regular tasks like browsing the internet, online shopping, sending email, doing stuff in spreadsheets, sharing photographs, etc. Software's mostly the same, in fact. And with this trend to make everything browser based, even more.
Of course things can go wrong, but it doesn't really matter which OS they're using. For example, should this last week botched Windows 10-HP upgrade happened to my father, there's nothing he could have done on his own to restore his computer.
Most people's computing needs would be adequately served by an iPad -- but those who aren't are typically doing more with their computers than can be met by any OS.
Once I show them Libre, they still want Office because Libre looks like it’s from Excel 2003 era and loses credibility in their eyes.
Then I show them Google Docs and Sheets and it looks nice. Literally all they need is something that looks modern. But in fact Google apps have actually been quite slick. Perfect amount of functionality at the moment. Google seems to follow keyboard behaviour and shortcuts for easy transition (especially Excel). Hope Google doesn’t bloat their apps over time.
When has Apple dropped the ball on support there? mac OS Mojave supports machines made in 2012...
And 6 years is typically the lifecycle of any laptop. By that point most people start looking for a new one.
Many of them are running Ubuntu on a laptop that would cover half the cost of a macbook. Not everyone can afford Jobs' prices.
Even if Apples were cheap, I consider Ubuntu a much better choice for an aspiring hacker / programmer.
I get it if you're trying to avoid the cost of an operating system, but that wasn't what you said or what I asked..
You typically have far more configuration levers, as well as deeper customization access. The stack is built entirely from open, accessible source, so you can ultimately customize every single part of it to your exact liking.
For example, KDE has an order of magnitude more levers than the OS X DE.
Not only is most of OS X closed source, it's also not particularly configurable.
It really is BSD, although the window manager isn't open source a lot of the rest is.
Of course it still needs an opened mindset to use Linux but its disadvantages in some use cases.
She is using OpenSuse.