Simple. It is called "compromise". Understand their concerns (they are valid IMO) and offer to change the logo but say you will keep the name for discoverability.
Using for example a baby bottle as your logo would be less offensive. IMO.
Using for example a baby bottle as your logo would be less offensive. IMO.
With the current logo I really wanted to integrate the actual output of the library, and it was fitting the name quite well, I thought.