https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_of_the_Greek_Cl...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_of_the_Greek_Cl...
I've just been on a holiday in Venice and Florence, which made me question that standard wisdom, as I learnt more about Venice and Constantinople.
The most important effect of those texts, I guess, was the Italian Renaissance. Petrarch seems to have found his books by hunting through old piles in attics, and the Venetians got (looted?) theirs directly from the Byzantines. It isn't clear to me that the Arabs had a major role.
The Spanish got their classical books from the Moors. But what did they do with those books, and why does that matter?
Arguably, had a huge affect in kicking off the Renaissance
That's what happened during the Mongol Conquests. The fall of Baghdad alone caused at least several hundred thousand people to be killed. The main library, which had collected countless works over the centuries, was gone.
Baghdad was rebuilt, of course. Economically and politically it bounced back since it was still right on the silk road. But scientific study never really recovered there.
[1] Initially listed his brother Batu, rather than Berke, the first Muslim Khan.
And even further west Andalusia was still chugging along. That was definitely an important source of knowledge for the first universities in the rest of Europe.
I wish this was not the case.
I do not care who produces the science, we all are one and the same. Science benefits all.