Hacker News Reader

Comment by mauricioc | Hacker News Reader

Are you utopcell@google.com as in [1]? If so, I would say that's worth mentioning.

[1] https://research.yahoo.com/mobstor/publication_attachments/w...

Wow, this is definitely worth mentioning. Explains why the OP was incredibly biased towards Google while putting down one of their competitors.

Biased towards Google ? I stated my opinion: I _trust_ Google. I do _not_ trust a company that chooses to increase their revenue by numerous smearing campaigns.

As for putting down a 'competitor' [sic]: Google owns 'duck.com' via its On2 acquisition. What do they show if you visit the page ? "If you meant to visit the search engine DuckDuckGo, click here."

"The OP" works at Google precisely because they think Google is a force of good in the world, a company I'm proud to work for, not the other way around.

This is what you said, and it's clearly biased because you work for Google. That is the definition of bias.

> Would you trust Google, a company that has delivered real value, has helped democratize access to knowledge at a global scale and has everything to lose if it was revealed that they are misusing sensitive information

Indeed I am. I'm sure your first thought was to use Google to find this information.

You shill on HN for basically every Google-related thread, so it's not like they'd need to use Google to find out you had connections to them.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17094934

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18267828

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18179176

Solid argument. Everyone that has a positive opinion about Google works for them. You might want to search for the threads of my not positive opinions as well though.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com