"a noticeable bias/axe to grind since she's pretty anti-feminism and considers there to be a "war against boys". Also she works for the AEI which is a conservative think tank."
This strikes me as "poisoning the well."
This strikes me as "poisoning the well."
My point was that people should base their opinions on CHS' claims on her evidence and arguments, rather than who she associates with.
Edit: I'm not trying to change your approach, I'm just being blunt about my opinions. I appreciate your open mindedness.