>Avoiding algorithms doesn’t apply to traveling in beautiful places. I depend on algorithms in expansive natural parks. When I’m in Patagonia, I want to do the best hike. In Alaska, I was to see the prettiest glacier. The focus is on nature, not people.

I actually disagree with this (in part).

I get what he's saying. Why wouldn't you go to some objective best in terms of scenic beauty?

But I'd argue that, at least in some cases, there are almost as good locations that are far less crowded that may make for reasonable alternatives all things considered. US National Parks tend to be National Parks for a reason and they are usually worth visiting. But, in many cases, there are nearby Wilderness Areas and National Forests that have many of the same virtues with a fraction of the people.