No one says you have to use Apple's payment processor. Direct users to sign up on your website and then have them download the apps free of charge.
Btw; So does Google and Microsoft. They all take a cut of every app sale. The difference is the rate they take out.
Oh, for Apple, it's 30% the first year of the sub only, it goes down to 15% after that.
Apple has removed apps from the App Store for doing this [1]. You have to provide an in-app subscription option that gives Apple the 30%/15% cut.
[1] https://changemap.co/hellocode/exist/task/1855-apple-blockin...
Did Exist offer a way to sign up new accounts in their app? If yes, that may be it.
Slack doesn't have IAPs and yet, I can sign in with paid accounts just fine. There are other apps that were like this but they didn't have a way to sign up in-app IIRC.
So it only works if users first go to your web site, sign up, and then get the app on the App Store. If they get your app on the App Store, there’s no way to convert them without Apple’s blessing.
Essentially Apple contractually mandates friction between you and iOS users and then charges you to alleviate it.
Dev here, I actively campaign against Apple (and FAAG) products.
They seem like a danger to our capitalistic system as they have enough power to sway politics.
Apple has always been anti-dev from my point of view, forcing users to use their hardware and pay to produce apps.
While there doesnt seem to be many 'good guys', Apple has used their weight to constantly do unpopular things for their customers and developers.
My only hope is that Apple will fail to innovate, and users will begin to go toward more consumer and dev friendly high end products.
For someone that doesnt mind getting tailored ads, the privacy argument is a non-issue. I am curious how long this will last at Apple as well, they don't strike me as a company that wouldnt sell your data.
EDIT: HN is very weak when it comes to critical thinking on Apple products...
Such as?
Good! Capitalism has failed a great many people.
Business owners using their power to sway government is the foundation and backbone of capitalism, historically (sure, it may violate post hoc rationalizations of capitalism, but those have little to do with capitalism as it has existed in the real world anyway.)