Does anyone have a contrasting opinion? The article seems to focus on just not explaining with enough specificity what they want, but I find this is extremely common so shouldn't overly effect one particular employer. In fact, I found this job post to be quite well written. The scope is a bit wide (40-120K is quite a range) but I feel like good applicants will know whats expected at different points on that range.

https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/honest.work/posts/effecti...

Part of me thinks this might be over generalizing from a small sample size, i.e., does honest.work get enough traffic that a lack of applicants is truly indicative of quality. Of course there is also the fact that by pricing by the job advert they naturally encourage overly-broad adverts for broadly similar jobs, so that's probably not helping.