The dinner that destroyed Gawker
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
I also don't understand TechCrunch's angle on this. Are they trying to say this is bad or good, or just write a novella about Peter Thiel. It was gripping as long as it lasted.
First they published a story of debatable newsworthiness: Hulk Hogan having sex on tape.
When they were ordered by a judge to take down the story, they stood defiant (the famous "A judge told us to take down our Hulk Hogan sex tape post. We won't." post: https://twitter.com/gawker/status/327537977922318337?lang=en).
Then someone came along who actually had the resources to see the whole thing play out in court (a funny reversal of the old "this giant corporation has the money to outlast any court case, don't bother Mr. Little Guy"), they rightfully lost, and STILL the bitching continues over something that could have been prevented entirely if Gawker had simply listened to that judge's orders. They're not martyrs, they're idiots.
Nobody Speak: Trials of the free press https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6333064/
What? He has someone sitting outside in a running car while he sleeps? If true, that's remarkably stupid.