Or just destroying the entire cancerous concept of landlordism and housing as a commodity.
No need to get all complicated, the solution is pretty simple.
No need to get all complicated, the solution is pretty simple.
I'm not sure what you're asking re: what would remain. Housing as a human right, I guess? There's no good reason for landlords to exist, nor do I understand why you would want housing to be a commodity especially considering we live in a post-2008 world.
Beware of that solution: you have a chance to fight a landlord, you have no chance to fight the state-landlord.
I don't see where you get your conclusion from. For many (most?) people, they really don't have a chance to fight their landlord. Legal expenses, time, energy, etc. are pretty huge deterrents. Not sure why you can't fight a "state-landlord", also.
Are you sure about that. US government spending is 1/3 of GDP, while rents are around 1/10.
> Not sure why you can't fight a "state-landlord"
Because the state has the power to make it illegal to sue the state. You need to win a supreme court case to beat the state into something, and you will be paying taxes to fund your opposition all the way up to the supreme court.