I don't think they're technically "allowed" to use those sorts of lights in Southern Ocean either but each nation is responsible for enforcing the treaty and most governments don't. It's also my understanding that Japan is pretty open and notorious in their Antarctic fishing in violation of international treaties but everyone just sort of shakes their head without doing much to stop them.
Edit: Not particularly detailed but mentions the lack of regulation/overfishing in the area: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/shortcuts/2016/oct/...
Though I do think many of the hardest problems today are regulatory (climate, health, digital political advertising), not necessarily technical.
Point to a job that doesnt require human interaction and someone in the field can tell you how to make him jobless.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgrFXN4d1Jc
Its disturbing to say the least.
But to the other comments - the fishing industry is horrifically unsustainable - there is no replenishment to the degree from which we take from the oceans.
Poor measurement of fish populations, and even when the data exists stating that populations are over fished, shady regulatory boards provide licenses to fish what shouldnt be fished.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-future-of-fis...
Will this make fish much much cheaper?
Will it be easier to regulate since it is all data is stored? Are these companies more interested in regulation (since if theyve invested so much they may want longterm production)
It would certainly allow for clean, unpolluted fish and let the fish in our oceans recover.