> The vast vast majority of advertisers do not want to be displayed next to porn.
This i dont understand though. Who wouldn't their product to be subconsciously associated with sexual satisfaction?
This i dont understand though. Who wouldn't their product to be subconsciously associated with sexual satisfaction?
I'm also wondering why super-targeted advertising (showing actually relevant, and deeper integrated ads for different pages/posts/videos/etc) is still not a thing, there was a movement towards it but it kind of died down, even as everyone is shouting about ML and AI everywhere.
And to be fair, most of the ads that appear near porn is extremely low quality, so they may be right.
Of course it is a self-perpetuating issue, but that doesn't mean that they can just fix it.
Found it: https://blog.eat24.com/how-to-advertise-on-a-porn-website/
But Mattel, Sony, GM, Apple, and American Airlines aren't signing up anytime soon. That's the problem for Tumblr.
I think this is just one of those instances in which a customer just starts costing you too much money. Will banning the low-rent crowd make a difference at this point? Who can say really. But keeping them pretty much ensures you will not get access to the deep pocketed advertisers.