I'm curious, what was your motivation for subscribing to the Times instead of getting your news from elsewhere?
And, connection problems aside, are you satisfied enough with the service to continue paying for it?
And, connection problems aside, are you satisfied enough with the service to continue paying for it?
The cost is worth the fact that I find the articles much more...enjoyable(I'm not entirely sure that's the best word!).
Connection problems aside, I have been satisfied with the service. If I hadn't been a Times reader before, I don't think there's anything there that would persuade me to pay for it, but to me, the cost is worth it.
So you want to continue to read content from a media outlet that has an agenda from a particular political perspective AND you consider this an important part of your day.
I'm sorry but I have to respectfully disagree with your methods of thinking. Doesn't this make you blind to anything else out there?
I'm not sure what your political views are, but if you are left-leaning, how much Fox News do you watch? If you tend towards the right then do you read The Guardian and/or HuffPost?
My main problem with the paper is the fact that many of its news articles are enthused with a relatively large dollop of opinion - and quite often the opinion that's being touted, specifically aligns with points of view which are directly beneficial to Rupert Murdoch's business aims.
His media properties do his bidding on a regular basis; the blatant conflict of interests on display, regularly disgusts me.