Australia rushes its ‘dangerous’ anti-encryption bill into parliament
techcrunch.com
techcrunch.com
I already know of a case where an Australian subsidiary is being shut down and all operations being moved to Europe in response to this draconian measure on the part of the Australian government. The company just doesn't want the liability of operating in such an environment, and has now classified Australia as equivalent to China in terms of risk factor. So, a multi-million dollar budget goes to Europe instead, and Australia loses a tech leader.
This is only going to hurt the Australian people.
Move away from us, we should be considered toxic. It's the best thing that can happen for the rest of the world and it's the best thing that can happen for Australians.
We are officially bad citizens of the internet and our contributions should be scrutinized as such.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-12-06/labor-backdown-federa...
I have little hope of that happening, however. Australians would rather smash avocados than exercise their sovereign rights to demand better politicians.
I'll vote for privacy. Please give me an option.
We can't be trusted and don't deserve technology. Take your business elsewhere.
Please quarantine us so our sickness can't spread.
Which is great, because trying to rush it through was a farce. My favorite part is where there were 170 amendments made and published only at 9:30AM today with the debate/vote on the issue only 3 hours later. And it wasn't the only topic of discussion. Meaning basically no one would have read let alone understood or considered all of the amendments.
I know the USA had a similar situation recently, passing some new controversial bill with several hundred pages of unread amendments (I can't remember which it was, but it wasn't long ago)
I really wish that kind of process was outlawed (har har). These processes should generally ensure people have had adequate time to read an consider all changes, amendments, etc.
Of course the Australian government continually tried to side step normal due process this month, specifically calling to skip over normal process.
The whole thing disgusts me, regardless of how good an idea you think the general scheme is or not (spoiler alert I don't think it's a good idea, but even if you did, the details can really matter and shouldn't be rushed).
Some more details from the sizzle: https://share.thesizzle.com.au/antiaa.html
- An Australian
Also techcrunch's page is ridiculous. If you scroll down to the bottom of the page, it goes to the next story and you literally can't scroll back up. I've never seen a page ruin scrolling so badly.
They did not even bothered to be present, the girl was on skype and a guy on the phone. Room was empty.