1) Her situation isn't rare/unusual. Miscarriages happen all the time.

2) >She's making assumptions that all of these studies from data science and usage of recommendation/personalization systems are for her benefit. They're not, she's not paying the bills on that. That's for someone to sell her something.

Advertising (at its best) is for the consumer's benefit. A consumer needs to make informed decisions about their purchases, and they need information disseminated to them to make those decisions. That information being released is advertising.

As a human being, she is entitled to make the case that those who create and control the information dissemination systems don't cause literal terror.