Apple Discontinues Xserve, Only Available Until January 31st
macrumors.com
macrumors.com
Was anybody actually using them? OS X is a wonderful single-user-facing operating system, whether that user is a clueless consumer or a Unix-loving developer. But there's nothing that sets it apart as a server system. Similarly, while the hardware's quite nice, there's nothing about it that makes it superior to alternatives.
But of course, people will inevitably spin this as proof that MacOSX is about to be locked down like iOS.
My company uses it for a FileMaker server, not much more. Better than the busted PowerBook it ran on previously…
- DVR
- To do mega-project: car install as all-purpose media server/center (though I have read that there are kinks in this sort of setup, especially as concerns audio)
- Home security setup / server for video feed
I should disclose that I own more of these little buggers than is probably warranted or advisable.
Some of these links are practically ancient, but they're where I started, and they are good jumping-off points:
http://macdevcenter.com/pub/a/mac/2004/02/13/home_automation...
http://boingboing.net/2010/06/24/ipad-home-automation.html
Let's be honest: the reason I don't go as far on home automation as he does is a) I'm not really interested in being a power user of some of the home auto features he advocates; b) I am too lazy/occupied to write a custom UI that would theoretically be foolproof enough for guests...let alone myself first thing in the morning before coffee. :)
Dislaimer 2: Alan is very much a kitchen-sink approach kind of guy (as is evident in the pics of his rather ungainly and uber-comprehensive UI), whereas I am a minimalist.
I think the missing piece is a Mac Mini with a Light Peak connection for external drives. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_Peak
A Mac Mini with 1-2-3 external drives connected using Light Peak will be more than sufficient for most small companies, and this will be much cheaper than an Xserve with the same amount of redundant disk space.
They regarded it as a natural step with minimal retraining for their technical people (where technical means less technical than your average HN reader).
I guess they'll be coming to me to look after their next servers.
I like Apple, but I don't think it's spin to see this as just another move towards Apple Electronics being only a consumer oriented company. The question is then what else will Apple consider not consumer oriented? MacPros? MBPs? Any device not running iOS?
Apples secrecy and the lack of any sort of roadmap only lead to more speculation and uncertainty.
You need AFP servers because Samba share handling is so bad on Macs.
Seriously though, Mac OS X Server has a ton of advanced valuable services (email, calendaring, booting clients off server based images, time machine server). I think it's totally cool for Apple to continue charging for it.
http://www.macrumors.com/2010/11/05/apple-releases-new-serve...