I found this a good overview for that question.
https://www.quora.com/Do-credible-historians-agree-that-the-...
https://www.quora.com/Do-credible-historians-agree-that-the-...
TLDR; the evidence that Jesus was a real person is very strong, and stronger than many other historical figures (the article mentions Hannibal), whose existence is not considered controversial.
As a religious figure Jesus is inherently controversial, which is what probably attracts the skepticism and interest in trying to cast doubt on his existence.
Richard Carrier actually counters each argument in the Quora post pretty convincingly.