Personally I've only been in 1, one of the newer utes, and it felt like a 15 yr old base-model rental, despite being brand new and spec'd out.
Few examples of previous models bombing their testing:
> The budget Great Wall Steed ute has scored a shocking two stars in the latest round of ANCAP crash testing, against the 2016 ratings criteria.
https://www.caradvice.com.au/545184/great-wall-steed-flunks-...
> Chinese Haval H9 SUV slammed in world first independent crash test, conducted in Australia
> [...]sales of Chinese vehicles have almost come to standstill in Australia after safety recalls of Great Wall Motors utes due to asbestos components and poor crash test ratings of earlier models in recent years.
https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/motoring/chine...
If I remember my history correctly, this used to be true of Japanese exports too (and Taiwanese, and Korean, et al). Hopefully the Chinese will improve with time, and start to be known for high-quality exports!
A 1960s mini minor, or a fiat 500 or even a fiat panda or a Citroen 2cv would be as dangerous. And yet, entirely street legal.
And as a result year's NCAP 'stars' signify something different to previous model years, so a zero rating in 2018 might still be better than four stars in 2014. That is important when comparing against second-hand models.
Personally I think that NCAP should just rate on actual impact protection measures and provide additional, supplemtary ratings for other features.
Also no dealer, service or parts supply here in Europe so no thanks. Stick with my Citroen.