Hacker News Reader

This article doesn't even seem contrary to scientific consensus as far as what factual information is presented. It's just about how it's packaged in order to form his argument. It's sort of a lawyer-y manipulation of terms with some added hyperbole and even appeals to fashion sense that are misrepresenting what IQ is and what the consensus actually is.

IQ research is not part of the reproducibility crisis.

Psychometry and IQ is the single most replicated field of psychology. There is no reproducibility crisis in psychometry.

Individual anonymous comments on HN are even less reliable.