Maybe the information asymmetry is part of the problem itself.
Banking system is centuries upon centuries of arbitraty constructs. It does not make sense from the ground up.
That also describes the English language, and yet here we are, still using it.
In general, something that's lasted centuries is more likely to last centuries more, than something that's only lasted one decade.
I'd wager that the literature on banking and finance far outweighs resources on anything crypto. Specifically compared to papers on crypto coming from a neutral perspective.
Your statement is just plain wrong.
edit : clarification